Brent Corrigan Regret

control of content, programming and manipulation is the control

Its author is not the first who has studied the control of the world population through manipulation and mind control through the media, detect, and had, how easy is it to realize can be -Sufficient funds required. Each punter is as interested in the values held by the rise in the rate, that bring profits. Now suppose that this speculator could manipulate the masses to buy its shares (= rise) without fear of any consequences. If our speculator without it or would he, to get to first manipulation successes and maximum profits are trying, more influence over the decisions of the mass and thus guarantee more billions and power, particularly when the manipulations are financially self-supporting or securing additional income? You decide!

Did you know that the venerable Wall Street Journal was originally published by two punters (not journalists) who wanted to influence the courses with the help of the articles of specific shares to their own advantage? At that time handled legal, now illegal, but only excluded or discrete? You decide!

But again back to the index:

The large (book) publishers, such as Button, Simon and Schuster, Random House, Viking Press, Macmillan, Grosset & , Dunlap, Bertelsmann etc. have the same structure:

New authors will be selected from a large number of manuscripts and contacts. In Germany, for example, publishers will receive around 4,000 manuscripts annually, of which about ten books are published (and not 3990). In the U.S. literary agents take the pre-selection, as no major publisher is willing to negotiate directly with an unknown author. No manuscript that the interests of the editors of these houses or the agent is contrary, has a chance of a publication. Is it still published by a small independent publisher, it is ignored by the mass media in general (no ads, no Criticism) or torn apart by in-house critics. The quality of a book does not necessary sales. Only when the audience knows there is a specific book, an interested buy it and read it. Small independent publishers do not have enough advertising budget to make a book into a bestseller. The above large publishers have over spending millions on the other hand, advertising and PR departments, Private media (TV stations, magazines), critic, distribution chains, and can manipulate actively a "suitable" level book in bestseller.

Every U.S. and worldwide bestseller has secured a large audience (see Spiegel bestseller list, eg Goldhagen, King, Grisham, Brown, etc..) and is thus also to international opinion makers. In other words,

A small group, a "class" of thirty editors and editors in New York City decides what millions of people read before falling asleep, and consequently think.

What these editors have in common? -They are all replaceable at any time, easily controllable employees in positions of high social status and influence. want this dream job no one wants to lose ... Resistance to discrete instructions from "above" is therefore unlikely, an "automatic" censorship, "Scissors in the head", probably. Suggestions (eg to move a certain politicians) are followed.

(Who here wants real names of the editors and chief editors to submit to certain ethnic and religious solidarity or derive, must know that it is possible to change in the U.S. (and in the UK) without problems, and many immigrants in particular, their names after the second world war have neutralized and Americanized in order to avoid discrimination, for example, FD Roosevelt held Rosenfeld, Henry Kissinger held Avraham Ben Elazar, John F. Kerry held Kohn as his grandfather, John Jay Sullivan held Netyanyahu Benjamin, Harry S. Truman takes Samuel Treumann, First World War British media tycoon Lord Northcliffe star place, media tycoon Robert Maxwell High instead Ludwig, Paul Julius Reuter place Samuel Levi Joseph, etc.). More important than the names of media makers, but are content to be disseminated throughout time and again. Not the origin or religion of media makers is crucial, but their work, so the reports, articles, shows, documentaries and movies etc. gleichgeschaltet If these general and a specific political direction homage there, a media monopoly)

The gap in the head

An "automatic" Censorship is so successful in the minds of the writers (and writers, filmmakers), already, is because it is known that everything else is rejected anyway.

If a writer from a foundation or a large publishing company with an million-dollar contract to write such a biography or documenting a historic event, says the writer, what is better unmentioned (eg, the Rockefeller Foundation paid shortly after the war approximately $ 150,000 to commission a formal version of the second world war, the translation world this day still taught in the schools of the "international community" is).

And should not the writer know what to "give" it should be "inappropriate" passages later by Tutor / editor deleted. Should he then get a second job, him / her the unspoken "rules" known by now, that is "successful" writers, filmmakers, journalists, etc., which are longer in the business know, by definition, the rules and follow them as well.

follows: No script, no item, no film, no report, no information, etc., which goes against the interests the monopoly directed, has a chance of publication in the mass media.

The real consequences of the enormous concentration of power at a small interest group can be seen only at second glance, as these do not as active makers and perpetrators are known. Every little indication of a concentration of power is (with very few exceptions to follow) denied on the strongest, the effect of such denials and counter-pressure campaign, the concentration of power confirmed as fact. Any approach to criticism or the least deviation from the general requirements is so choked immediately, with the patch and the indignation medieninszenierten Tears of a tidal wave like any critic can overturn and drown them when they ever manage to present his analysis to an interested audience, respectively. to publish.

There is no one in politics, science and business (the "international community"), who successfully resisted in the past few decades has this power, without immediate prestige, position, career and possibly his losing freedom or his life.

Conversely, those who blindly support these interests, which is a Faust's pact same, at least temporarily "success" guaranteed. Politicians get (win elections =) intensive media support and more financial benefits, either directly or indirectly as a donation as a lucrative fees "engagements as guest speaker. Also popular are awards and prizes. Entrepreneurs are issued million-dollar (government) contracts and provides financial benefits such as subsidies and guarantees, the "democratic" about the political decision-makers (see above) can be approved. This "success" may of course be at any time "taken away" if new demands are not met or the person develop a conscience and should fall out of step. Because they expect so no criticism, the concentration of power grows daily. The interest group has de facto carte blanche, a Carte Blache, and thus an absolute power, which degrades any historical tyrant to a mortgage teacher.

Summary:

A media monopoly can control thoughts and decisions of the mass and thus ensures unlimited power and control. The establishment of a media monopoly is made over time, provided sufficient capital. Restrictive laws can be circumvented. Since a large concentration of capital on a small interest group for centuries, and if that is not free from power ambitions, it must be assumed that the media monopoly has already been realized.

The media monopoly can protect the interest group only (more) power, if it prescribes certain content requirements and rules and can currently absorb the impact reporting. The guidelines must be implemented by employees criticism freely and brought into line. Opinion leaders (journalists) who work for the monopoly, may therefore only report what the monopoly (and its owners) is ultimately useful. Facts lead us to conceal, lies will to truth, reason can reinvent themselves, evidence is unnecessary.

guaranteed long term, the media monopoly of the majority of the population of a world view that holds them in utter dependence of the interest group and them as slaves to make, of course, without that, the addiction and slavery to be aware of.