already realized!
Sunday, December 13, 2009
Maxine Cartoons Birthdays
"peace operations" instead of war:
A war always ensures the masterminds high profits (tax money is invested in very expensive armor and weapons that are naturally produced in arms companies controlled by insiders, which can determine their prices almost at will, veterans have to borrow from the masterminds to cover war costs). It need not necessarily be a real war, that a military conflict in which there is a winner. It is often, if at first artificial, but discreet, provoked riots and crises, which can only "for the benefit of all?" with the help of "peacemakers" can be solved militarily. So you can play war (and receive good money) without the people really know what happens far away on the spot. The whole thing can be delayed indefinitely when training, weapons and equipment of the soldiers have very bad quality, but the defects are visible only in an emergency. Key words here: "Friendly Fire" in the Iraq war, U.S. tanks and aircraft during the Second World War, the U.S. pp M-16 assault rifle during the Vietnam War, Star Fighter, Hunter 90 etc..
Examples of such a waste of human lives and tax money were all the wars since the Second World War. Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, Desert Storm, Somalia, Bosnia, the drug war that is now seen as a fiasco and is in the U.S. population no longer finds much support, was replaced after the World Trade Center attack by a fresh hysteria, "the war against the terrorists." The necessity of this war knows the mass of the media. Keywords: weapons of mass destruction ": The hype was wonderful how the mass media
always can" innocently "manipulate
simplify, it worked as follows:
-
Since the report corresponds to the intentions of the perpetrators (provide a pretext for invading Iraq in order "to make Iraq with new government, an ally of Israel" (Miami Herald 11:07:03), and almost incidentally, also to earn billions in Iraqi oil, and later reconstruction), the NYT claims to be from the other mass media (especially repeated CNN, AP, Reuters, UPI, etc.). The NYT is finally known as a reliable source. Fear mongers and crises can get the edition. Everyone wants to be well informed. Everyone knows "now that Iraq has dangerous weapons of mass destruction that" could be dangerous to us all. " The readiness for war grows.
-
It comes to the invasion. Iraq is occupied, threatened Israel and is no longer the self-service store pulling the strings. The goal is reached. Weapons of mass destruction are not found.
- 180% degree turn of the media: weapons of mass destruction existed probably not. Who would have ever believed in it, anyway just stupid (Jim Hoagland 05/30/2003). Everyone knew it, it was all about oil (actually it was also about to place a sworn enemy of Israel lame). Bush and Blair giving their intelligence to blame. Any bureaucrat is retiring, has an "accident" or committed "suicide". now-after the target is reached, must be criticized suddenly. Who is responsible for the misinformation? -Have we been deceived by the media? -Hardly anyone raises the question, and if however, the answer is no. No. No. No one is to blame, at least not in the mass media, which had "only" count on the New York Times, a newspaper that parroted despite various scandals, proven false reports and propaganda from other media houses in the "civilized nations" of the "international community" blind is.
* (A Germany correspondent for the New York Times announced several years ago because he was tired to be able to constantly announce only dangerous neo-Nazis who allegedly have large in Germany influence and disabled people in wheelchairs swastikas carved into the face constantly Synagogues threaten and plunder Jewish cemeteries, although many insiders are well aware that many of the neo-Nazi organizations without the financial and organizational help of the CIA (and GDR and the Stasi) in general could not exist, many Nazis actually V-Men and instigator of the secret are the Nazi threat ergo is mainly an artificial U.S. bogeyman to keep feelings of guilt among Germans awake and demand including permanent proof of innocence in the form of blind political and financial support for the "Holy Land, Israel, to. Why the CIA has such a strong interest in the welfare of Israel? -Follows).
other hand, is not unknown that the NYT is the unofficial mouthpiece of the perpetrators, that is what is in the NYT, unless such fact or fiction, be repeated with impunity. Who wants to do in the media of "civilized nations" of the "international community" career, you must write only blind and are not too many questions.
And in the New York Times? -The responsible editors can be understood only innocent. They have finally just "good faith" in the search of a reliable journalist (Judith Miller here) leave. So, Judith Miller has been criticized, but only after closed doors and also-ran, suddenly comes out that the lady has first-class contacts to the warmongers Abrams, Feith, Perle, Wolfowitz, Luti in and or around the Pentagon, and so has the wire-pullers, and really only repeats information which it had been leaked to discreetly from this camp. Thus, a reliable lady, of course future in the media has to fear and therefore no negative consequences. The "official" story seems more important than the actual story. The mass undergoes only between the lines ("What Times coverage tainted?" Max J. Castro, Miami Herald, 4:07:03).
-
Why take a historian and independent Journalists the "WMD lies" not as an inspiration, even all the American claims, perhaps since 1942, mainly reports the New York Times - specifically to check on veracity? -Because you then could find out something that the reputation and career cost? Because there is no "independent" journalists more, at least not in the mass media? -Probably. But even if someone had the courage to doubt the official version, the results would certainly be published by any media company, -
would say no one will ever know the truth. -
* See also: "Journalistic Fraud: How The New York Times Distorts the News and why it can no longer be trusted" (Journalistic Fraud: How The New York Times News distorted and why it can not be married longer) by Bob Kohn, a prominent and very rich New York's Jewish, so no anti-Semite ...) -
course, was and remains the WMD hysteria not an isolated case: Suddenly, out comes (NYT 23:12:03) that Rumsfeld & Co. as early as 1984 by Saddam " gassing know "and that it knowingly tolerated (www.nsarchive.org) because at that time Saddam was a good friend after all. But it is these gassings are supposed to be 2003 have been due to "liberate" Iraq ... Who can act killer makes himself an accomplice. As always, this information is only published after the war is already over, never before the Iraq invasion in spring 2003. -
Do you remember how the "New Economy" (Internet-shares, etc.) propagated by the media from 1998 to 2000, was to then-after the collapse of the stock exchange on "experts" and "investors "to make fun of the" have eagerly invested in "highly speculative, actually worthless shares and lost? Again, 180%-degree turn after the manipulation target was reached. The mastermind (and a few lucky dot.coms) could often earn billions of worthless shares, which then remained seated on the manipulated mass. must not be forgotten even that can be achieved with a little know-how falling prices huge profits (short, short sale) to invest
as if media of the stock market suddenly criticize as "unsafe" and no one else wants (price drop). Also been (and still is) well-earned on the debt of many investors who bought shares on credit and now expensive and costly in the long term may pay principal and interest.
the point: Editors Select a day hundreds of reports, which will be released (and what not). News, fit to be inflated, even if they do so "imaginative" or are pure fiction. As long as the editor may claim the status of having acted "in good faith", no problem. His reputation as an "independent" journalist, despite the squeeze in the head is not in doubt. The news of some opinion-makers (New York Times, Washington Post, Reuters, AP-Associated Press, CNN, Reuters, etc.) as facts from the rest (AP about 15,000 small and / or foreign newspapers and TV and radio stations / experts in 110 "civilized" nations) "good faith" and then taken over by billions of people accepted as truth ie, the manipulation that it is not official, successfully. If the whole thing out later as a lie ("badly researched"), will - if ever released, maybe a journalist and a little less of reply also-rans placed. The action / manipulation is achieved already and can not be undone. The billions are safe in the sack.
"It all comes out," such as the media always like to give friends, in order to emphasize the reliability of the media as watchdogs and critics. True in some cases already, but, strangely, never before or during the brainwashing of the people, always first, if the manipulation target is reached. Or initiates the criticism further manipulation. Then suddenly the media is extremely critical. And later it will have been suddenly no one ...
- Does it really make any difference? The next opponent is the mastermind of Iran. Once again it is alleged weapons of mass destruction (nuclear energy), which induce the crisis. Again to be negotiated. Good cop, bad cop. Re-build the media to the enemy and want to create a giant in the promotion of public approval. Insiders know: The war has been planned for years by the backers of the U.S. government. This time, with active support from the EU? -Possibly. by an alleged missile attack is directed at Israel, the Germany of "eternal support" had been promised? We read it in Spiegel Online (08/27/2005) that Iran should have long-range missiles that could reach Europe ...
- Again, no evidence, but only statements of some exiled Iranians. The main thing scare. Iran is Syria, following up the entire Middle East with its oil and gas well, unofficially as a Greater Israel, officially under the old name, "democratized" is.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment