A small group of people, von denen wir noch nie gehört haben, regiert uns, bildet unsere Meinung, formt unseren Geschmack und suggeriert uns unsere Ideen. Diese kleine Gruppe zieht die Fäden der öffentlichen Meinung, kontrolliert so die offizielle Regierung und plant die Zukunft...."
-freie Übersetzung von Edward Bernays, Propaganda
"Eine Handvoll Menschen kontrolliert die Medien der Welt. Derzeit sind es etwa noch sechs solcher Menschen, bald werden es nur noch vier sein -und sie werden dann alles umfassen: alle Zeitungen, alle Magazine, alle Filme, alles Fernsehen. Es gab einmal eine Zeit, da gab es verschiedene Meinungen, Haltungen in den Medien. Today there is only one opinion, which takes to form four or five days, then there is everyone opinion "-Mike Nichols, Hollywood director [Off." Lord of the thinking of the masses', Journal (www.pilhar.com ) 22 / 2nd quarter 1999]
(in German-speaking strictly prohibited)
Let disguise to participate and control a majority of corporate structures and puppets and the names of makers Anglo-Americanize and makers are reporting, news, shows, movies, books, magazines, websites etc., always accessible, publicly and analyze. So the old question, identified in 99.9% of the cases the perpetrators: Who benefits more from the reporting, financial or political? -Who is immune to negative reporting, despite supposedly "independent, objective and independent" media? And there are a few exceptions that prove the rule?
If someone as basically always against "Y" and writes for the benefit of "Z", of course, it can be concluded that the writer (or his Newspaper, show, magazine, etc.) by availing himself of "Z", with "Z" strongly identify or sympathize, or fear of "Z" has, or "Z" is checked, that is published, which suggests "Z". In no case can be assumed that the writer of "neutral, objective and independent" facts telling. Rather, each is reporting only the propaganda, of course not as clumsy and boring like the old Communists or Nazis, but emotionally charged, and most importantly, very entertaining.
* Y is in fact one of thousands of years old Germanic rune, which symbolizes the cosmic man with arms stretched upwards.
are interesting addition to the usual news and
Films and books on bestseller lists.(such as alternative underground movie that suddenly wants to see any). A bestseller is always made by the media worldwide. Responsible for success are usually more expensive advertising and media campaigns. Of course, despite a large advertising and flops, but without advertising is a guaranteed flop, with very few exceptions. "Quality" can be in need of "critics" (= Employed journalists, often from their own media group) to confirm. Without much moss nothing going on. Do you know of a bestseller that is not offered by one of the big media giants (see "bestseller lists")?
should
This monopoly of power will not be recognized by many who prefer to indulge in the romantic illusion of independent journalists with the rattle of the typewriter and whiskey, a corrupt politician case brings a cliché way, this is not for nothing disseminated by the mass media in several Hollywood films again and again. In fact, the politicians do not worry, as long as it secures the power monopoly advantages. He can even expect to be rewarded handsomely for his services, for example with a million dollar book contract.
Even if they fit a critical exception journalist can not change his mind and supported by the responsible editor is (unlikely), can always find excuses, a publication still prevent them "from above" (no space , accidentally deleted, lost, new data, etc.).
* See also: "Into the Buzzsaw: Leading Journalists Expose the Myth of a Free Press" by Prometheus Books
who control these exceptional men will still be developed only for one or more small publishers with unconventional programs and publishing them with a "subversive bestseller, media criticism, or otherwise Advertise. Is an unconventional publisher once known in the underground, the last remaining independent journalists and "conspiracy authors" submit their manuscripts in the hope of a publication. This not only immediately known which secret material is present in the scene, but also who takes the trouble to research this and summarize. Critical authors can be so easily determine, check, check and chill, most simply by a publication is made of the "dangerous" information by buying the publishing rights and the sinking of the manuscript in the drawer eternal impossible. Any unauthorized publication in the Internet, etc. would be a damage indemnifiable breach of contract (details of control and censorship attempts to follow the internet). If such an "independent" publisher only established, can also be credible on this misinformation, fake and fictitious findings are published, employing many seekers, confused and so detract from its development path for now.
It is not difficult to control writers and journalists, and thus to secure a monopoly on information.
If a politician (or a critic, etc.) against the monopoly of power knows immediately "any" of its "corruption". A company like AOL Time Warner will not only ensures high-speed Internet access (and informed as ever million Internet users with the latest news on the homepage and store their e-mails, and interests for years), but brings also CNN and HBO, and various magazines ( Time, People, Vibe, etc.) and Hollywood productions (Warner Brothers). Headlines on the internet follow reports on CNN, followed by Articles in magazines and a Hollywood film production. This corruption of the politician is an established fact, historically, the "Everybody knows" (eg, Watergate). Whether the politicians really was corrupt it or whether this was only assumed, to get rid of him is secondary. The career of the man is ruined. An Enemy of the masterminds behind removed.
a very effective tool manipulation are also music videos, especially hip hop and rap. What the teenagers and kids see it (Viacom's MTV) hours, repeated hundreds of times to monotonous single-drum rhythms that target full in the subconscious mind and the impressions there, establish it as a "values"? Almost always only brain-dead types in leisure clothes, gold chains and expensive sports cars, which always run great "fashion models". Message: No matter how stupid and primitive man than I might be, I get every woman (ie sex), I have a right to a horny woman (sex) if I can show just the right things. No matter how intelligent a woman may be, I really have to have a husband who has to have the right things. And how do I get the man with the right things? While I am as beautiful and sexy (vulgar as this beauty may be in the videos too often, Type: Video Ho .. but this is a matter of taste). What counts is only my appearance, what have I "vorzuweisen. And as I have a distinguished road? As I look good or just buy it (status icons, ornaments, knick-knacks, clothes, cars, makeup, Schönheitschirugie etc.).
If I do not have any money, can I borrow this at the bank (credit card) or somehow obtain (even criminally). The main thing I have money! Where things are is ultimately matter, the main thing, I can show them. And if I have no money, lend me not this may have no courage to steal it or otherwise acquire, I can only be a loser, a nothing that gets neither sex nor recognition! A perpetual outsider. Lonely and abandoned. Unloved.
is in both cases, distracted the teenager from a positive personality development (to a free, higher consciousness) and kept at the lowest level will be subject, used for potential slaves: the teenager to early consumption slaves and interest slaves, or "perfect are subjects ", which then can torment dissatisfied with a lot of work, little thought and countless compromises through life. The only alternative to depression and frustration are then apparently only drugs (this includes legal drugs such as alcohol and psychotropic drugs, a), which not only make any clear thought and resistance impossible, but and any assessment and resolution of the smallest life problems, and so any development that is based on experience and always endured conflicts / problems excludes. By guaranteeing a complete blast (suicide) or a custom zombie existence and thus a life-long, high turnover among others for the pharmaceutical industry. So no matter whether consumed or stunning, the mastermind always make money.
The exceptions that are actually criminal, to be able to consume (shown us how many videos) and blind to be "who", can be a threat to build ("Gangs"), anxiety guarantee the rest of the population and thus justify further control and "protection measures".
Responsible parents have a choice: You can buy their children the desired status symbols and they must be worried that children steal them or obtain the necessary money through crime. Who is with his personal difficulties as already fully employed, has no energy left to rebel and ask questions ...
part of this power strategy is that parents should have no more time for their children and teenagers, because they believe either a tax, consumption and interest slaves themselves, much work and having to make a career, or you need are jobs to be able to pay most necessary living expenses. The media, here the music industry (pop culture), pleased to fill the vacuum and be friendly to the wrong role model, counselor and parent substitute that conveys what is "right" and "important". So the next generation of slaves has been suitably programmed ...
(or music video) but was just entertainment and not to manipulate the situation? -Definitely not. What speaks against it, to mix entertainment and manipulation, so that the manipulation of entertainment? -If for some obvious Products are advertised (product placement, see eg James Bond movies), why should it not also a certain political objectives? - A film can do so much turnover and establish simultaneously a certain stereotype in the minds of viewers or consolidate through repetition. The more often we see this cliché, the more it becomes reality.
While we now know that advertising and political speeches to us for fools, are we filmed entertainment / music videos often impartial, open and relaxed about. We do not expect to be manipulated and often not even notice how our feelings in a certain Direction can be controlled. As professional filmmakers (as well as advertising specialists) but know exactly what effect (picture, music, story) a certain feeling of releases may be a desired feeling every time produced. Our so the filmmaker programmable feelings then lead to blind acceptance of the "Message", which will tell us the movie, just to unresisting reception of the desired manipulation.
(from "From PSYOP to Mindwar: The Psychology of Victory ")
And speaking (again) in a concentration camp, Holocaust, and Hollywood are: Why is there war movies until about 1970/75 (The old ham with Susannah York, Christopher Plummer, etc.) is hardly a mention of these camps and the Holocaust, from around 1975 but still stronger? If so the victim status of the "sacred" land to be underlined that had to justify since 1970 more and more wars of aggression and violations of UN resolutions and defiance of rulings by the World Court?
Even the term "Holocaust" (burnt offering) was taken in 1979 after the broadcast of the eponymous U.S. television four-part series in the German vocabulary. The "Holocaust" was the answer to four-part television series "Roots" that suddenly many U.S. blacks as the descendants of former slaves a Victim status conceded.
Today there is no World War II movie or book more, lacking a solid dose of Holocaust remembrance. Also missing may not be the graves of Jewish soldiers (Star of David instead of cross). If you believe latest Hollywood pictures were about a third of fallen U.S. soldiers of Jewish faith, although at that time were not more than 1-2% of all American Jews. And if a movie or a book does not necessarily during the Nazi era? It damages the success certainly not when a quick reminder is fitted to the suffering of the Jews (the other concentration camp prisoners are almost always ignored). The stronger these sufferings are worked out, often seems greater the chance of winning literary and film awards and positive reviews can guarantee.
Na, and who were the smartest, most escapees from the POW camps? Hollywood, of course, we believe the Allies. Who does not know the films that will be under the eyes of the stupid German guards dug a tunnel? Well, the most spectacular breakout of World War II tried 25 German prisoners of war in 1944 in Arizona, USA. The tunnel was 60 meters long. To use a river as an escape route, they had even built a folding kayak and tested under the noses of the Yanks in the swimming pool of the camp. Unfortunately, the waterway provided in the freedom but only as a small stream out ...
A good example of entertaining manipulation include the worldwide bestseller
(in the English original" Angel & Demons "and" The Da Vinci Code "):
Although "Illuminati"
Would a writer dare, a member of a Jewish religious group such cliches of attaching (for example, that some radical elements of murder of the Jews in order to save power), would his manuscript to every publisher of the "civilized nations" as anti-Semitic move into the waste. But as long as crazy members of the Vatican and the Arabs are criminals, there is classic bestseller material. In addition, succeed Brown, seemingly well-researched report on the Illuminati, the Bavarian Illuminati, without even once on the Jesuit church and law professor Adam pointed Weishaupt of Ingolstadt, out of fear that someone might mistakenly assume the founder of the Illuminati a Jew was, because "Adam" and "Weishaupt," are at least to mislead American readers with Jewish names, and could therefore become a Jew, and evil in his novel to the unit? This risk is a non-Brown and the Illuminati can better stay clear Bavarian, German words. This is of course permitted. At the end of the book, every well-informed readers will know that It has long been the Illuminati no longer exist-except in the minds of some paranoid conspiracy spinners ... This bestseller is guaranteed! A Hollywood movie in book format ...
intelligent and a real intellectual trip with a similar title (which should not be confused with Dan Brown), however, the book "Illuminatus!" (! The Illuminatus Trilogy) "by Robert Shea and Robert Anton Wilson
we "learn" such as: Jesus was not a single but as all adult Jews were married, and that with the beautiful Mary Magdalene. After the crucifixion of Jesus impregnated Mary Magdalene fled to southern France, where their descendants marrying into a princely family and form the royal family of the Merovingians. (What happened in the more than 400 years, really since the flight of Mary
M. from Palestine to the power of the Merovingians, who so who has married and pregnant when remains unclear. Never mind ... ). Brown is for the royal family of the Merovingians (448-751 AD) so that is directly of Jesus from (Chapter 105) and therefore has a divine and Jewish blood (though, ironically, heavily mixed with "Nordic", Franks, Teutons, Goths and Celts blood *). The alleged descent from Jesus was for the "evil, backward" Vatican reason enough to murder the Merovingian and proclaim themselves kings and emperors from now ...
Brown has his information
(1982, reprinted 1996, in German "The Holy Grail and his heirs", 1984) of BBC journalist Henry Lincoln ( official authors Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh & Henry Lincoln, ISBN 0-09-968241-9) entnommen, der nicht nur die obige Jesus/Maria Magdalena/Merowinger-Theorie ausführlich erklären will, sondern auch "klarstellt", dass Jesus nicht am Kreuz gestorben ist, also auch nicht von den Juden ermordet wurde, diese folglich auch nicht schuldig sein können (keine Kollektivschuld, siehe auch: Passion Christi von Mel Gibson, folgt), und wenn er doch gekreuzigt worden sei, dann könnten nur die Römer verantwortlich gewesen sein... Obwohl ständig darauf hingewiesen wird, dass die Merowinger die (teilweise) jüdischen Nachkommen von Jesus seien, und der Stammbaum des Königsgeschlechts ab 417 dokumentiert wird, fehlt jeder Hinweis auf eine Verbindung der Merowinger zu Maria Magdalena and thus (before 400 years) to Jesus. Even Jesus' relationship with Mary Magdalene, the supposed pregnancy, and the flight to France of today are just speculation, at best, handle down legend.
seem obvious that each side acting stupid authors also document the difference between a real and genuine notarization of a copy of a document do not know (see, eg, postscript, 1996, No. 12), and thus have difficulties, not to fall for fakes (a notary or embassy confirms the authenticity of the copy, but not whether the copied original document also genuine, authentic or content is applicable).
course, forget the authors that royalty have claimed have always wanted to be descended from the gods or gods to be (very clear with the Egyptians, Greeks and Romans, and even today is called some people out of God "choice" to be). This justifies claims to power and control over the faithful masses. The fact that those in power to kill not only appropriate but also "evidence" make, let rumors and legends, distribute or use them as "proof" is nothing new (see mass media). How often will rely on the Bible when it suits? Even the "journalist-Trio uses texts from the Old and New Testament, when they prove their own arguments, but verreißt elsewhere in the Bible as unreliable legend. Is it possible that the (alleged) Merovingian and Crusaders Godfroi de Bouillon wanted to legitimize with similar "evidence" as the rightful king of Jerusalem?
(*) An interim idea of ancestry, race and blood: Both Brown and the BBC's Lincoln Trio forget that it is completely irrelevant these ancestors someone had the presence of 1,000 or 2,000 years, as "descent, race and blood "after four or five generations (ie 150 years) are no longer noticeable, when these are mixed with other races. Have a child as white and black, this is a "hybrid" (Example: Sade, Halle Berry, Beyoncé). If the half-breed child with white, this might look even more "exotic" (for example, Jessica Alba), but usually is not already clearly a race to assign. If the "exotic" now a white child with this rule is accepted as "white", ie the "black" influence is no longer recognizable. Has the "White" White is now a child with this "white", ie the "black" influence on the family tree is no longer recognizable after four generations. Even for the Nazis Aryan someone was when the grandparents (or was it the Great-grandparents) were Aryans. Relevant were thus only the last 3 or 4 generations. It helps Brown and the trio of journalists not much that the Merovingian actually the (Jewish) tribe of Benjamin, which is, for then migrated about 3,000 years ago about Troy / Greece to present-day Germany and France. Let's assume that the tribe of Benjamin has not "racially aware" isolated for thousands of years (otherwise would be an inbred, guaranteed by the descent would ensure no one ...). The constant influence of the Greeks and then later by the Germans, therefore, should allegedly Semitic blood have mixed so far that even the Nazis of the Merovingian race fanatics accepted as Aryans had. Brown and the BBC trio still try everything to the Merovingians to have "Jewish" appear. Why?
we follow the speculative argument and very selective evidence of "Holy Blood" to you and prove I had a "divine" origin: you only have your family tree identified as far as possible and then claim that your primitive ancestors came of a noble line from which can be directly traced to the Merovingian or descendants of the Knights Templar as Godfroi. This is true of many noble families, giving you several proven ways.Not detectable, however, is the origin of your ancestors by the noble family. Of course not, because your ancestor was only one (illegitimate?) Child who has been concealed, or your ancestor was given as a baby during a war / revolution as a foster child of a (walnut) farm family, and then (after the murder of his parents and family members ) grew up with the family name of the peasants and kept them. Or the family name was changed during the French Revolution, the Thirty Years War, the Inquisition or some other time chaos (in your current last name) in self-defense and kept secret, etc. All the documents were destroyed in the XY-war or revolution or lost or destroyed on the run from enemies of your family. Witnesses no longer exists. Can be found in your tree also (allegedly) Jewish ancestry, you can always intimidate critical skeptics about the anti-Semitism accusation. Since you have neither fear nor critics have evidence to the contrary, your only claim to be correct. QED
Again, there is no evidence, proof to the contrary but not ... all lies, everything is permitted ... (See also: Picknett and Prince in Jim Marrs, Rule by Secrecy including p. 324, 325, or: "Descendants of Jesus Or Scam Aritists Extraordinaire By Jonathan Vankin and John Whalen). Who wants to go deeper here, should research independently under search term "Prieure de Sion" on the Internet because:.'s argument and "evidence" of "Holy Blood" is either wishful thinking of naive BBC employee (not a journalist can really be so naive and stupid, or does it?), the have searched for a spectacular best-Story, or deliberate falsification and mass stupidity on behalf of certain interests of power.
There remains the question of why the "Holy Blood" nonsense in 1982 and ever published by the BBC even broadcast a television documentary was. Bestsellers potential and high ratings or planned mass manipulation? Manipulation in which direction?
* Lt. Pages 70/71 in the very interesting book bombs, bread and banks I "by Stefan Erdmann (www.amadeus-verlag.com) are the authors professed Freemason
want the satisfaction of using the BBC's reputation made" Holy Blood "These (the BBC would never lie ... but) ultimately the door for a new "Super King" show, one raised above all doubt "world rulers / priests" (Chapter 15) that "legally" over all, but should prevail in particular the Christians, because running through his veins the blood of Jesus or . should flow? (Who the illegally-referred to by experts as a fake - has "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" read, this idea is simply not going ...).
Or is "Holy Blood" suggesting that all "real" nobles (= all truly noble man?) Actually are of Jewish descent, and so naturally sympathize all "real" aristocrats with Israel would (Paoli Quote (Ch. 9, p. 269): only the Merovingians were true aristocrats, the rest was only made to the Pope, etc. ... The predominantly Germanic influence on the gene structure of the Merovingians is ignored by the authors strangely ever )? Or is "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" only sent the accusation of collective guilt (Bible Quote: "His blood be on us and our children.") Invalidate or detract to the Romans? Or somehow it all?
test question: would a best-seller have been possible, would prove "Holy Grail" the divine descent of some Teutonic families (to work out without the possibly Jewish influence)?Dan Brown has obviously seen through the very sketchy "evidence" of "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" (see Chapter 60). Still, he lets his novel "The Da Vinci Code" just follow this reasoning. Even the name "Plantard and Saint Clair" are mentioned as legitimate descendants of the Merovingian (Chapter 61), although Brown but from different Internet sources, the truth about "Plantard de Saint-Clair" etc. and "notarized copies" - should be aware of evidence (see "Holy Blood" Post Script, 1996, No. 12), ... No problem, because a novel is after all a product of fantasy, not a scientific work ...
Why not mention Brown then that fiction book "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" explicitly in Chapter 60? The guilty conscience of an author who has the story of another author's "borrowed"? Or will Brown just to make sure that the statement of his novel, seemingly "scientific" evidence and thus "interesting" and be more credible? Or should readers be interested opened here sent a "scientific" source for further research and the chance for "Holy Blood"
again in a repeat Bestsellers achieve international sales and consequently be able to dumb down? ("Holy Blood" was 2003 / 4 actually again at a non-fiction bestseller in the U.S..) And guaranteed Brown this generous and free (slow) advertising and best guarantee for a textbook of "his" publishing house (Random House), and thus the millions spread the "Holy Blood" manipulation, his own bestseller advertising budget? Or is it already the "message" of his novel?
question in their own right: Anyone who knows even a bestseller in the non-Jews as the lovable good guy "who can hardly walk before generosity" (Simmel), are characterized as "property in general" (Walser)? Is there a best seller in which someone as a Jew and is portrayed as power-horny killer (as always Arabs, radical Christians and Bible fanatics, politically-incorrect American Southerners, German in the postwar years and the U.S. is still the blacks, etc.)? Not someone who kills his wife and then regretted it the rest of his life and suffering, or as a traitor who kills then blame yourself plagued etc., but as a seasoned serial killer, Sexverbrecher, brutal terrorists, just as a real pig ... Is there such a character at all? And if not, why not? Because the Nazis at that time already for the next 1,000 years already bad enough published mongering of Jews in their propaganda works, and every author here fear the reproach any parallels? Because it is simply "bad taste"? Or will the fact that radical Christians, Arabs, American Southerners, African-Americans and German on the world media simply have no great influence and therefore always happy to serve as the enemy / are structured? Enemy by whom for what use?
0 comments:
Post a Comment