Pokemon Platine On Line

is how the brainwashing from concrete

Past crises billion guaranteed (t) s

crises will always exist, because surely those behind these incredible profits. Those who wish to profit and control, must therefore produce only a crisis or a war, thus creating chaos, just to make then an apparent order and security (eg peace) in view (ordo from chao), even when the chaos to only provoked be had or just a fake is (dangerous viruses in distant lands "). This philosophy, the trick book of dark intrigue, "Il Principe / The Prince" by Nicolo Machiavelli taken, and for more delicate souls Georg Gottfried Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel once academically as "thesis, antithesis = synthesis" polished up, is evident in almost every modern crisis and can be simplified example of a divorce, declare:

both parties, husband and wife are agree and want the divorce. The non-small fortune is divided. It need only a few agreements are signed and the divorce is for 1-2000 € (lawyer and fees) done inexpensively. You can go part as friends. The couple are happy, but not their consultants (hardly earned) (Thesis). A lawyer should now wish to secure additional fee claims, he will find a supposed problem to be solved first (provoking crisis) must be: "to step 3 in the contract, you should however not be satisfied, my lady There's surely a lot more in it for you." So B must advocate for the new requirement will be noted. This may suggest his client now that the claim "of peace because" to meet (and therefore to prevent further fee claims) or refuse. In this case it's a complicated legal dispute, which may be contrary to long and expensive (war, anti-thesis). If the lawyers are (implicitly or agreed) agreed to continue the dispute as long as possible, the assets of the Mrs eaten by the attorneys' fees. Episode: At the end of each party is still less than before the conflict, but the lawyers have earned good (synthesis).

clear: there is a problem or invented match (thesis). An alleged solution is offered (antithesis). A particular goal is achieved (synthesis).

A war is nothing but a divorce case: Although the populations of all nations are basically in agreement and do not want war, the government will continually comment by advisers on a possible threat of war, which neutralized only by upgrading can be. This ensures good profits for arms companies and banks, the equity holdings in the industry, and for the consultants who participate either directly through stock options profits of the armaments industry (illegal) or get a topbezahlte position (and book contracts with millions guarantees) offered the prospect of ( legal). Also, nations must borrow to finance the additional financial burden of armaments, which guarantees high interest lenders profits. Since the consultants all participating nations rush against each other, extends further misinformation or a small spark to a "preemptive strike" to be launched, the answer obviously with a counter-attack is. It comes to the war. More needs to be prepared, ie, more money flows to arms companies, banks and consultants. Thus, for example, could (whipped up by the media), the First World War in Sarajevo develop a trifle, as the direct consequence of the Versailles Treaty and the Great Depression followed the Second World War.

Who are these "consultants" today? The "couple" are the manipulated populations of individual nations. The consultants are a group of perpetrators representatives (see Wolfowitz & Co in the U.S. / "Bush" Department of Defense), politician puppets (eg, Bush and Blair) and the mass media, the crisis at any time provoke "justify" and may ignore or, which can then be used as a pretext for action.

will benefit how? Tax money is put into actually unnecessary armor and weapons. The state has debt. The population is enslaved on tax increases. More finance it (the banks) only if certain compromises are made (see eg Lord Balfour Declaration of 1917 to follow). Result: profit, power and control is through constant crisis-real or provoked-guaranteed.

It is therefore imperative for the effective ruler of the world so much Crisis potential to create as possible (through media manipulation or actual confrontation) in order to finance or power demand at any time make an already fully accepted war or crisis pretext can transfer the tax money from the state treasury into his own pocket. Here are a few examples of an infinite series:

Israel

In 1917 Zionist 2nd Lord Lionel Walter Rothschild by Lord Balfour in 1917 a letter from this as a British Foreign Minister should give the Jews the right to live in British-controlled Palestine. Whether the so-called "Balfour Statement "a condition for further loans and Rothschild influence on the U.S. entry into World War II (with the help of its Wall Street bankers and Colonel House), could consider an independent historical research (and remains unresolved). In any event, Balfour very inaccurately worded note a betrayal of the Arab war partners, which had promised the British independence if they would help in the fight against the Germans and Turks. While the Arabs adhered to the agreement, broke the British their word.

What better guarantee of crisis when millions of Jews in anti-Jewish, Arabic dominated areas to settle and then to leave even nuclear weapons with full freedom of action? Let us not forget that the crisis in Israel (with the PLO, Hamas, etc.) in addition to U.S. military bases in Arab is Nations-led like to be the cause of global terrorism, which in turn world as a pretext for right and freedom restriction of billions serve human needs (money laundering, terror laws, etc.).

The constant threat to all Jews around the world also welded together as a "victim", a status that can be strategically exploited by a small group of power (to follow).

Because Israel is a nation of "victims", it takes only one small state out of the right to ignore UN decisions and rulings by the World Court if they fail detrimental to Israel, but demand immediate universal support, if that Israel to gain profits. In general, then immediately leave the United States their teens for the "sacred" land to fight and die ... In Germany, the mass media ensure that for Israel adverse rulings by the World Court or UN resolutions often do not or only "also-rans will be known ... (Coming closer)

Berlin:

1945 is the 9th Army under General Eisenhower on the march to Berlin. German resistance, almost no longer exists. Who else can and must fight on the Eastern Front. The Americans had a couple of hours later to be in Berlin, but Eisenhower gave the order to stop. All of Berlin could have been American. Instead, he lets the Russians invade rob in the city, and rape. The later West Berlin becomes a island in the Eastern bloc. Why?

Why Eisenhower received from Roosevelt ordered to leave the Russians in Berlin and the city does not to occupy yourself or to help the Russians during the occupation? The only reasonable explanation: Roosevelt followed the specifications of its masterminds create the conditions for a future trouble spot wanted a powder keg that could supposedly explode at any time and only by the united and uncritical use of all Western nations (and of course, tax increases and upgrades), led by the U.S. can be saved. As long as Berlin was threatened, was the western world, so that the United States directly threatened. Or, as President Kennedy said: "I am a Berliner!"

paid in 1961, the "Berlin problem" then even billions of times: The CFR member Theodore Tannenwald wants to establish that Kennedy is able to lend directly, without the consent of Congress for nearly nine billion dollars for development assistance loans. Without the ability to be sufficient loans to developing countries, would exacerbate the crisis in Berlin. Kennedy has, in radio addresses attention to the dangerous position of Berlin. Every newspaper reported: Without the money was a disaster inevitable. Everyone knows the president needs the money. The Berlin must be saved ... Why the lame bureaucrats in Congress waiting for? After the desired law is adopted and the U.S. taxpayers are now paying interest and principal for more $ 8,800,000,000, one of whom he never see a cent advantage for themselves is (unless he moves to Israel?)

the Berlin crisis suddenly disappears from the headlines. Until next time .. (See "The Invisible Government by Dan Smoot, 1962)

Cold War:

The alleged hostility between East and West was a well-made fraud of all involved nations, since neither East nor West really were planning a war of aggression and to be governed at the highest point in any case by the same group. The alleged threat of war was but a first-class Pretext, burned up to billions in arms that no one really needed, and to control its own people by "fear of war and enemy (" If it does not fit you here, go over there but after "). Same time, the USSR and the USA divide so the world without risk to themselves.

* See Simmel, "The one does not see in the dark" ... not as a source but as an inspiring conversation. And: "On behalf of the State" by Andreas von Bülow, who is already in the early chapters, who could really benefit.

to believe? Now, few people want to know that the Russian revolution without the aid of the seven Wall Street bankers Warburg, Rothschild, ship, Vanderlip, Harriman, Morgan and Rockefeller would not have been possible at all. And who is paying, the music. Leon Trotsky (real name Lev Davidovich Bronstein or body Braunstein and 1917 journalists in New York City) and Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, only Wall Street puppets.

Or how did the "top philosopher of the" Trilateral Commissioners "and mastermind of the New World Order Zbigniew Brzezinski:

" The Soviet Economic Development 1917-1930 was mainly due to the technological Help of the United States. . More than 95% of industrial structural development of the USSR have been supported by them "

On June 14, 1933, said Louis McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking Committee, to his colleagues:

"The Soviet Government has received from the U.S. Treasury funds derived, by mediation of the Federal Reserve Board. The federal banks have cooperated in this matter with the Chase Bank, Guaranty Trust Company and other U.S. banks. "

... with not only Wall Street Insiders know that the "Chase Bank" by Rockefeller and have been checked, the "Guaranty Trust Company of Morgan (and are), in addition to Rothschild, Warburg, Kuhn Loeb & Co. and Harriman Vanderlip also a founding banker and owner of the" Federal Reserve were "or on discrete structures of participation and still are. Jacob Schiff, president of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. since 1916 and was chairman of the Zionist movement in Russia. "

-detail in "Black Empire" from ER Carmin (www.nikol-verlag.de) of origin and the Brzezinski and the McFadden-Quote John Jurgenson in "The opposite True, Volume I "(p.188) (Argo publishing house) and in" The lucrative lies of science "(S.398) (Ewert Verlag), -" The Russian Revolution "in" Rule by Secrecy "by Jim Marrs for insiders. Often, the British Lord Milner, etc. as a financier of the Russian revolutionaries specified Lord Milner was the head of Cecil Rhodes secret society "Round Table", which later went to the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Cecil Rhodes was. .. financed by Lord Rothschild Rothschild Rhodes made his sole heir

Who is on German sources of funding should not forget who was behind this "German" Sources: The International Bank Warburg.

Communism was not the result of a spontaneous uprising of the masses, who demanded more justice, as some idealists, romantics and reformers today want to see, but only a provoked crisis of money lenders, the East and West against each other and play to secure huge profits, control and influence could.

Note: You can secure control over a nation in which they conquered (Caesar, Napoleon, Hitler, etc.) or replaces a non-controlled government by pliant puppets (mastermind). If we succeed in first several independent States in a federation of states, such as the EU, USSR, etc. to join, just have a single government, the top management of the Union, must be controlled in order to master all the participating States.

The actual background of the Russian Revolution should really all do-gooders be warning enough that are committed to selfless (want to), without thinking about who really pulls the strings in his hand (see, eg, environmental protection, Greenpeace, World Wildlife Fund, Blue Masons, Rotary, Lyons, etc.). Who'd have guessed the '68 generation for example, already, that the already "classic" Parisian unrest Cohn Bendit alias Kuron Modelzelewski France 1969, a third of the gold reserves, costs and business here in the provocation of expensive crisis the real background of the "student revolt" are? Who Kuron Modelzelewski motivated and how? Cui bono?

There is probably an idealist nothing more painful than the sudden realization of having been exploited by their own ideological opponents (such as environmentalists from the oil industry, do-gooders of Wall Street, a Mason of high-grade fanatics, etc.) . This pain can be avoided only by an independent media-intensive research.

For Conspiracy theorist is in this context that the pentagram

interesting. Have you ever noticed that almost all U.S. "enemies" run the same five-pointed star in the national flag or coat of arms as a war like the U.S.? Check out the star (in red) on the old Russian tanks and the flags of Iraq, Liberia, Somalia, Panama, Grenada, Vietnam, Cuba, North Korea etc. and monsters-in-law of Syria and China more closely. (The only exception is Afghanistan, but for years by any national government, no one takes seriously the U.S. puppets, but dominated by various "tribal leaders" is that enemies are also part of each other, as well as Iran.) Or the arms of professional revolutionaries like Che Guevara or terrorist groups like the RAF dt. Pure chance or should indicate the common overhead line? The EU flag is therefore also a circle of pentagrams.

not unusual to see even in TV reports about alleged chaotic anti-globalization movement, a brief overlay of the Pentagram (eg on a protest banners or T-shirt). Again, coincidence or reference for insiders, that the anarchists are instead intended as agents provocateurs to discredit peaceful world dictatorship on behalf of opponents of globalization, or to create chaos? If the five-pointed star around the initiated to the "Frankfurter Five to remember the five sons of Rothschild (and / or paying any divine guardianship people of the Freemasons), and indicate who holds the real power in those countries and organizations, or is it all just a coincidence, because the pentagram a pretty Stern is

Hitler?

And who actually has the rise of Hitler and rearmament in Germany financed How was the Nazi German economic miracle financially from 1933-1939 at all possible you sure?? without the American loans of Wall Street banks. A name that in this Which in addition to Rockefeller, Harriman and IG Farben (IG and the directors, the banker Paul Warburg and Max) always occurs, Senator Prescott Bush, father of George and grandfather of George W. Bush.

The strategy is clear: If you have no "enemies" is that can always justify a crisis or a war, you have to create the same ... and get long enough ... Because guarantee "enemies" wars and thus reap huge profits ... Castro, Noriega, Saddam and Osama can greet ...

In the very recommendable book "Rule by Secrecy" by Jim Marrs we will read the chapter "Business as Usual "that Rockefeller for his Standard Oil until 1942, the German army with oil backed, of course not directly, but through front companies in Spain and Switzerland. The Air Force would have no particular chemicals (eg tetraethyl lead), the only Standard Oil, General Motors and DuPont were produced and then sold to the IG Farben not be able to fly (see: "Trading with the Enemy: An Expose of the Nazi-American Money Plot 1933-1949" by Charles Higham) Hitler's Wehrmacht. mainly drove Opel, a General Motors car. Only when it became clear that Hitler war could not continue longer, further assistance was refused, and the next crisis the Cold War, planned.

Other sources know of Hitler's special contacts with the Jewish banker Max Warburg, the bank Mendelssohn & Co. in Amsterdam, the J. Henry Schroder Bank in New York, London and Frankfurt and the Jewish banker Kurt von Schroeder Cologne. On 01/04/1933, for example, Hitler, Papen, banker Schroeder and John Foster Dulles * met in the house of the Cologne banker "with a view of the Rhine" and decided to Hitler's chancellorship. The Jewish banker Waldemar von Oppenheim was declared by Hitler as "honorary Aryans" and could manage the Cologne banking house Sal Oppenheim undisturbed during the Nazi era continue ($).

* John Foster Dulles = Director of the Henry Schroder Banking Corporation, who later became U.S. Secretary of State, brother of future CIA director Allen W. Dulles and cousin of the Rockefellers, said Rockefeller, like

JP Morgan House of Rothschild as U.S. puppet / "Partner" / trustees were preceded by / in order to hide their own activities and ownership and to simulate a competitive situation. * "Hitler et moi" (Otto Strasser).

More construction and financing of war and enemy guarantee Hitler read and Others p. 64ff in "banks, bread and bombs II", 2nd Ed (Stefan Erdmann), "Israel's secret Vatican, Volume III" (Wolfgang Eggert) and "So was Hitler financed the missing document from Sidney (James P.) Warburg (Publisher diagnoses, Leonberg)," Privacy Policy "2000 edition , pages 262ff. (Dieter Rüggeberg), "The Insider" Gary Allen, and in great detail ($) in "Black Empire" (ER Carmin / www.nikol-verlag.de), especially p. 202ff and including n. 268, and "Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler "(Anthony C. Sutton)

who is interested now and want to know who Hitler really out of official history was (puppet leader or what?), do not ignore what has worked in Hitler's family, single mother as a domestic help and suddenly pregnant with Addy was small. Is not it funny that racial fanatic Hitler up to his blue eyes himself not as Nordic, Aryan looked? Find myself again-it's worth it if you do not want to stay with his partly Jewish ancestry but identify who may have been Hitler's father! (A reference, see Jim Maar "Rule by Secrecy").

What Nazis (including Hitler, Himmler, Goebbels, etc.) of Jewish descent or of Jewish families were used, see page 90 and 258ff. in "secret policy" outputs. 2000 (Dieter Rüggeberg, www.vbdr.de), "Black Empire" (ER Carmin) and "Before Hitler came" (Dietrich Bronder).

Unbelievable? Lt. SPD newspaper "Forward" (1.11.69) came also the "Catholic" Freemasons and English dictator Francisco Franco (Bahamonde) from a Jewish, conservative family, was funded by the Jewish banker Juan March and as is well known and militarily by Jews who hate Hitler English civil war and to reduce ...

Cuba

Kennedy pulls (or the CIA?) In the last minute from the air support for the Bay of Pigs invasion, which guarantees the failure of the attack a group of Cuban exiles and their destruction and thus a "dangerous trouble spot" in front of the house. Had failed Bay of Pigs invasion, to turn off another invasion discussion and to keep Castro in Cuba? Were the alleged CIA attempts on Castro just media hype, reality show entertainment in the cold war? Why no attack was successful? The CIA is so incompetent? If the United States and Cuba would have been really enemies, then why the Cubans tolerated for years the U.S. military base in Guantanamo Bay (the present-day U.S. concentration camps)?

Castro was in the United States an enemy that could detract from the poverty on the island, and was in leftist circles next to Che to the heroic myth, while the U.S., its population steadily with the "red danger" make at the door afraid huge defense budgets - and later other wars and military operations in the Caribbean - could justify ("No second Cuba": Grenada, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Panama ... etc.).

Countries

revolutions, coups, Rebellions, civil wars. The media is full of crises in the Third World. One crisis after another (Liberia, Sudan and Lebanon, and, and ...). It's not about revenge, justice, idealistic world a better place or religious strife goes (as shown in the media), but the cheap acquisition of entire industries or the installation of a willing puppet head of state, a glance shows on each card, the natural resources or strategic identifies positions. No one in the mass media, however, dares to ask the question, let alone answer, who benefits from these crises and, above all, who has again and again these crises provoked and financed. Even insurgents need Weapons and not fight without pay. Who pays for this? Where do the rebels have the money? Without weapons, supplies and supply can exist either an army or a guerrilla organization. Even armies of children need to eat and need ammunition. On closer inspection finds there the same name, often camouflaged only slightly behind the two contending parties (see above). Other historical examples, details and sources, see many more in the book "On behalf of the State" by Andreas von Bülow.

Iraq, Osama & Co.

all know: Had the U.S. for example, Saddam Hussein does not support generously to just before Desert Storm in weapons deliveries, his invasion of Kuwait (1990) would not at möglich'gewesen. Simplified: The U.S. arms sales to Saddam provoked a military imbalance in the Gulf, the occupation of Kuwait led to what turn the "peace mission" and "liberation" of Kuwait through the "New World Order", that U.S. and colleagues on behalf of the UN allowed. Moreover, the whole maneuver "established" clearly the need for a "global task force" that now (real or exaggerated by the media) with every small crisis like a private mercenary force without a lot of questions in the Applications can be sent in order to advance the interests of the perpetrators under a gray cloud of peace, freedom and human rights. be

Occasionally it can also puppets like Saddam Hussein officially burned out. Friends hear when money is well known. Even the best marriage can end in divorce. Nothing is forever. CIA friend Noriega in Panama is an example. Osama Bin Laden to another.

Manuel Noriega was trained by the Israeli secret service. Israel was also years later, his friendship. He bought an apartment in the district of Tel Aviv, Herzliya. His children went to the Jewish Albert Einstein School in Panama City and in the summer in an Israeli kibbutz. Who can look at older pictures exactly, the Israeli parachutist badge to find Noriega uniform. From the CIA he received $ 200,000 pa (North Point, On Target, David E. Pitt, Feb. 90). Whether he was paid by the Mossad or was acting out of friendship, is irrelevant. It is important to recognize that Noriega was not such an "independent" dictator of a tax haven but a puppet pulling the strings. When Noriega was therefore a drug lord

, who was then his drug

royal ? The old CIA partnership and friendship between George Bush and Gen. Manuel Noriega was broken after the General of the Aoki Corporation (economic supervision: Prescott S. Bush, the brother of George) received four million dollars "consultant fee" had to approve the construction of the Panama water works by Aoki. Noriega, according to Los Angeles Times had indeed conceded, but then refusing it. Of course, there was a dispute. When the campesino-General then also began to parts of the defiant "nationalize" $ 350 million investments by Aoki in Panama, he provoked the U.S. invasion. Not

different for Osama: As is generally known to have been Osama's people for years funded by the U.S. to Afghanistan made as "freedom fighters" the Russian resistance. The freedom fighters of the past are now suddenly terrorists. CIA friend Noriega as a drug lord is sitting in jail in Florida, USA. Saddam (or a double?) Somewhere in Iraq. But where is Osama? The must send as the exiled revolutionary Snowball in George Orwell's "Animal Farm" messages (on video) to TV stations like Al Jazeera / Al Jazeera, the Arab orientation is emphasized constantly by the Western media, and therefore suspect, permit only local straw Channel CNN & Co. to be (Al-Jazeera in Qatar is still known to many as the local BBC station).

This video messages will then confirm that the "terrorist threat" not over, is a "threat" by the way, pull out the wire-puller especially the great benefits. If these messages are not forged, so do Osama behaves strangely, just as the mastermind behind it. And if the news is fake? Then-but by someone who is to secure the counterfeit advantages, someone who wants a confirmation that the "terrorist threat" is far from over (= crisis, see above).

Consequence: Without making horny consultant, career horny journalists and editors as well as the psychological dwarfs in politics were not at war possible, since the Population by itself never war will never be benefited and always ready for war incited, manipulated or forced to be ("Imagine is before there is war - and no one will fight": Not manipulated subjects can not waging war, the manipulation of the media take over. .) At least the power of the media (journalists and career horny rectal entered editors) can be taken if the manipulation of intention can be recognized by the majority and the mass media no longer believe.

The military "difficulties" in Iraq (2003/2004/2005 resistance) must be so not necessarily in American ignorance and incompetence must be justified. to be provoked, it is quite possible that guerrilla attacks destroyed by the relaxed and unaware of restored infrastructure (= crisis) to the U.S. so as to provide a pretext to keep free the country "until further notice" busy / (= Help ). This also explains the torture scandal, 2004: The published photos achieve two things: U.S. politicians puppets come shortly before the election, under pressure from the media. This pressure can be tightened or removed. No one criticized the mastermind trustee Wolfowitz & Co. puppet Rumsfeld is the bogeyman. And the Arab world (which also receives CNN) is placed against the occupiers, ie there is resistance to sharper, less surrenders, more Arab anger and greater solidarity, a total of more victims and chaos. The conflict is thus extended. Future military action the U.S. will be even more expensive, take longer to secure more profits ...

* Wolfowitz is rewarded in April 2005 for his war profiteering with the executive chair of the World Bank ...

And because the rebels will all come from Iran or Syria, or who should always be "liberated" as the next of the U.S., the Iraqis love Americans finally since the liberation, justifies every bomb a sharper U.S. engagement in these countries. And this costs money and guaranteed profits ...

should not forget that each Krisentag those behind can get richer. A total of 50 billion USD for 2005 are planned, provided the armed forces in Afghanistan and Iraq can be reduced by one third. A liter of diesel costs the U.S. taxpayers $ 100 (no joke: one hundred dollars). And who transports, organizes and fills up the fuel? Halliburton. Cheney's company is involved in every deal in Iraq, the restoration of infrastructure to the food distribution in hospitals. For a fee of course. The U.S. tax slaves to pay the bill. And should there really ever any protests are just a few percent deferred. For meals alone may Halliburton calculate two billion USD. As result, the 15% price reduction, no tears, especially since "the company was forced to the deductions from their party to pass," that is getting worse, the soldiers now eat.

And the irony: Halliburton is mainly on tax havens such as Bermuda, Cayman Islands, Liechtenstein, and Vanuatu managed, ie, the U.S. taxes are limited to an incredible $ 25 million (pocket money the next fuel bill will be added easily) .

So: either the land occupied and stolen the resources or, if that does not work, at least guarantees a long-term crisis that makes the mastermind behind multi-billion dollar gravy train. Everything possible to play as long as the media. What was the reason for the invasion? Oh yes, mass destruction weapons and poison gas ...

The most dangerous weapons of mass destruction, the mass media. Because they destroy the spirit, creativity and courage of the people, and replace them with fear, mistrust, guilt and self-doubt.