And again: The gap in the head
Sunday, December 13, 2009
Would 12 Zopiclone Kill Me?
See for yourself:
-A concrete example: "war criminals" and "violates human rights" are not only in the recent years a popular media topic. You can certainly still remember Pinochet human rights violators and war criminals Milosevic. In particular, the investigation into Pinochet made headlines for weeks, even though in fact innocent of any is, until a court can confirm the blame clearly on the basis of evidence.
The trial was initially delayed because of possible diplomatic immunity. Nevertheless, the allegations remain and impact point in the media is not enough. Pinochet also had retired to await the investigation, first in a British prison. Everyone could suddenly remember the terrorist acts of torture and horror. Every little investigation against a third world or general intelligence chief, Montesinos in Peru, for example, is widely replaced by the media. Even the arrest of suspected Nazi infantry, for example, an alleged guard in a Concentration camp or a concentration camp accountant, brings global headlines, just like graffiti from primitive neo-Nazis on Jewish cemeteries. Well, that's all well known and can always be confirmed in the Daily News. Also goes by only one week, in which you are not reminded by the media to the atrocities of the German past? Early July 2001, a Belgian prosecutor decided against Israeli leader Ariel Sharon for human rights violations and war crimes to be determined. The charge: Under the command of General Sharon were slaughtered in September 1982 over 700 Palestinian refugees in Beirut, Lebanon. Some estimates even of 2,000 victims. Women, children and seniors under Israeli command tortured, raped and dismembered. No one disputes this field Maas (even Israel), only wants Sharon does not feel responsible for it. The responsibility of a commanding officer for the misdeeds of his troops, however, at least since Nuremberg established legally.
The investigation coincided with the visit to Europe by Sharon. The Belgian government distanced itself from her attorney. The German government criticized better watch Israeli settlers to establish themselves in Palestine, then to "protect" from the army to leave, and so the Palestinians de facto take away the land. Since Israel but because of the Holocaust is a right of "self defense" was, as one could also probably do anything about.
EU economic sanctions were rejected by Rolex Joska, the green environmental protection and human rights defenders, specifically. Did he fear that the Mossad or the CIA (again?) Rumkramt in his past and leaked another "embarrassment" to the German media, which could cost the green Maßanzugkarriere? - We do not know. And neither are, of course, evidence can be found for such maneuvers. Or is the Israeli reference to the past suffering of already?
comfortable as if any criticism can be turned off with a slogan like to head pressure. There are critics (eg in Syria), which accuse Israel to benefit directly in the Holocaust: Had there been no Holocaust, the Israelis would have had to invent one (say the Syrians). Only then could statehood, multi-billion support from Germany and the United States and the ongoing terrorist acts and wars are justified. Not for nothing, therefore, ends up anyone who doubts the Holocaust in public, in Germany not only in prison *, but as in all Western nations commit immediately social and professional suicide.
* Who Betr. official history of the Holocaust publicly only doubts (on efforts of the Central Council of Jews is necessary since 1994, no more hate speech, a doubt is enough) can go in Germany up to five years in jail (Penal Code 130, para . 3). Can the Holocaust but no longer be doubted, he will untastbar, some believe, to the decent people, not just all need to feel under threat of punishment (even if they have not experienced the Holocaust, no eye witnesses and therefore the reporting third parties have to leave). The Holocaust is something sacred, an untouchable God. No, something that is greater than God, because no one has to believe in God, at least not as "educated" people. No one is currently burned for heresy, but in prison must pay for the Holocaust doubters. History repeats itself, and no one notices it. To avoid misunderstandings: The author wonders whether it makes sense to protect the official history of criminal laws. An evaluation of the official history in Germany, he will not occur.
The argument "self defense" is all well and good. It's like as if you were in the garden with your neighbors to settle, there, your tent and set up your grill, and then to start, digging a foundation for a house. If your neighbor asks you to disappear, you refuse. If it is aggressive and yells at you, you feel attacked and insulted. He then threatens you with a few stones and a stick, get your gun out of the tent and pop it off. Self-defense. On television, will be shown later, as your neighbor threatens you with a truncheon. And the whole world knows that your neighbor is a very dangerous, violent man, you had no choice. Your grandparents have finally suffered enough ... They move into the house of her neighbors, which lawfully belongs to you after a few weeks. They have always lived there.
The Belgian investigation and charges against Sharon were ignored by the EU politicians in general. Much more interesting is how reacted specifically the human rights advocates and media on the investigation of Sharon. Finally, if every decrepit Nazi been hunted for lesser allegations around the world, always accompanied by big headlines in every newspaper, every news show, and then finally from witnesses him for almost 60 years have not seen clearly to be identified as guilty although every lawyer knows how unreliable eye witnesses.
may be considered Finally, much burden of proof, if it is suspected Nazi criminals. Perhaps because the condemnation of a Nazi always promotes the career (and an acquittal but can ruin this, no matter how innocent of the alleged Nazi may seem). Also any other "third world" would be up to politicians to resolve this matter as Pinochet held only once or at least not been received with full honors. But how did the media and human rights defenders in the case of Sharon?
After a recent article, "also-ran in the Washington Post, a report was given by the investigation of the Belgian prosecutor, there was absolute silence. Nothing on CNN, nothing in the Washington Post, and certainly nothing in the "Star", "Focus", "mirror" of which it-as with the rest of the German media-are usually only very rarely an issue in which somewhere and is somewhat reminiscent of war crimes and the Holocaust. In the U.S., instead, was the disappearance of the intern Chandra Levy (not Levinsky), which allegedly had an affair with a congressman, thick headlines. In Germany, focuses on the suicide of Hannelore Kohl.
has now closed the case against Sharon. Who would have thought? Primary: Sharon could not travel to Belgium to the process and a process in his absence was not possible. Since no one knows about the procedure must be no legal reason to be found to stop it. A silly enough excuse ...
In July 2003, then the "embarrassing" Law of the newly elected Belgian government was abolished: Now only one can be convicted in Belgium if perpetrators or victims live in Belgium. 
funny too: In the German media is always written Sharon Sharon. If the leave extra "c" and so be his name Germanize German, confidential? -He should be for the Germans are "one of us"? -See also: Israeli participation at European sporting events.
The media black-out in the case of Sharon, unfortunately, is not an isolated case , but suggests a German mass media rule: On 09 July 2004, the Israeli wall ("security fence") by the World Court declared illegal. As a well-informed reader mirror you shall know nothing of this ruling and may not know that the "holy land" laws violated and must not ignore the judgments of the United Nations and the World Court with impunity. The mirror (and a majority of the German media, including Focus & Stern) has activated the same for Israel very negative manner, or Judgement so deep among the also-rans hidden that I have not noticed, and so many other readers probably will not ... Only the evidence of Sharon's criticism of the "report" (as Spiegel Online called the verdict) of the World Court has on two lines of mirror online-without any further explanation, hidden in a short PLO bomb article.
Only when the UN on 7/20/2004 confirmed the sentence of 150 to 6, and even CNN reported, smaller items in the FAZ and the world (22/07/2004), but not the sins of Israel to condemn but to give most of the Israeli ambassador to the UN an opportunity to vote the UN, the EU und insbesondere Frankreichs und Deutschlands, das sich normalerweise bei Abstimmung bezüglich Israel enthält, zu kritisieren. Im "Spiegel", "Focus" und "Stern" wird auch die UNO-Abstimmung nicht erwähnt. Sind die "großen" deutschen Nachrichtenmagazine nun Israel hörig, feige, untertänig und gleichgeschaltet oder ist der Blackout ein Versehen oder Zufall? Sie entscheiden!
Wie lässt sich diese Zensur der "freien" Medien anders erklären als mit diskreter Kontrolle?
Aber das ist nur meine Meinung, und ich könnte voll daneben liegen... Sie entscheiden:
-Another example is the media pressure on the Swiss banks in 1995. You remember: The Swiss banks should compensate Jewish refugees and victims who had assets deposited in banks in order to protect them from the Nazis. The banks had supported the Plünderaktionen the Nazis. Since you probably do not CH-Banker in the Second World War, you can know the "facts" is probably only of the "Spiegel", the daily press and television. Without the constant misinformation of the media, the spread of OSS (forerunner of the CIA) rumors and exaggerated headlines, It would have been possible to persuade the Swiss, a guilt complex and at the same world to put a negative image.
result, suffered greatly in the U.S. The Swiss banks had committed high sales. The seizure of assets in the U.S. (eg, investments, retail outlets, etc.) to secure
84
of claims arising from damage claims as well as a complete economic boycott would be very likely .
The only way to end this smear campaign, it was innocent or not, the demands of the World Jewish Congress, among others to give in and pay.
Or how did Gregg Richman: "The Swiss bankers had in the court of public opinion to answer where we set the agenda, the bankers were delivered to us as pleasant and we made judge, jury and executioner.."
Or Rabbi Singer of the World Jewish Congress: "What can the banks need the least, bad publicity and we will take as long to say the banks." Enough, We want a compromise ..."".
If a representative of the World Jewish Congress may admit publicly to set the agenda of public opinion, and to ask judge, jury and executioner and take as long as desired publicity to be able to until the World Jewish Congress desired goal is reached, I need to here no more poetically down-wind side to side as possible to provide factual, who the Western media has total control. The quotations from Gregg Rich Man and Rabbi Singer (translated from "The Holocaust Industry", UK Edition) reveal it to you. In black and white. Further comment is superfluous. I Believe will prove the practice every day the media control:After had been so raked by the World Jewish Congress with the help of media pressure, the Swiss, the German economy was in it. Then the Austrians, the Poles and the Dutch ...
to do then, instead of Germany alone responsible for crimes, the guilt is simply extended to other States, until the entire world (and particularly EU) suddenly has a bad conscience and pay. The Italian Senator Marcello Pera put it on the 60th Anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz at the UN as follows: "How was it possible that Europe could commit at the height of its civilization, such a crime? How could Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, collaborationist France and others are responsible for such massacres "(Liberation of Auschwitz, Agencies, 1/26/2005).
Even the Poles should apologize for massacres suddenly under Nazi occupation. Not the Nazis, but the Poles themselves have slaughtered 1,600 Jews in Jedwabne in 1941.
Also, 50% of all artifacts in the U.S. are actually Jewish refugees ... and if you do not believe the art of story do you are probably an insane anti-Semite ...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment